Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Abstract
Background and objective: Counting talk test (CTT) is a simple test based on ventilation function which is used to estimate the anaerobic threshold. In this study, it is established the persian version of CTT and evaluated its psychometrics features for determination of anaerobic threshold in healthy young females. Materials and Methods: Three groups of healthy female students (with low, mid, and high aerobic capacity, n=19) were selected by stratified purposeful sampling. Giving informed consent, they took part in 2 sessions of exhausting graded exercise test (EGXT) which were apart by 1 week. CTT and gas analysis were administered respectively in first and second sessions of EGXT. Ventilatory estimations of CTT were evaluated by results of EGXT. Using SPSS software, data were analyzed using by one-way ANOVA. Results: VO2max of 3 groups were significantly different (F(2, 54)≥32.44 and P≤0.01). Nevertheless, in anaerobic threshold, mean (±SD) of heart rate (HR), Borg scale, and CTT were approximately the same and respectively equaled 177(±10) beat/min, 15(±2) degree and 5(±1) numbers. In anaerobic phase, they were remained the same and respectively equaled 193(±7) beat/min, 18(±1) degree, and 3(±1) numbers. Conclusion: The results showed that CTT can be considered as good as heart rate test and sometimes can be better than Borg scale in determining anaerobic threshold and anaerobic zone. There was a negative linear correlation between CTT and intensity of training. For healthy young females, a counting of 5 indicates working in anaerobic threshold and a counting of 3 means working in anaerobic zone. The use of CTT for determination of anaerobic threshold was confirmed by our findings.
Keywords
2. Beaver, W.L., Wasserman, K., and Whipp, B.J., 1986. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2020-2027.
3. Borg, G., 1998. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics.
4. Borg, G.A., Hassman, P., Langerstrom, M., 1987. Perceived exertion related to heart rate and blood lactate during arm and leg exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 679-685.
5. Brawner, C.A.,Keteyian, S.J., Czaplicki, T.E., 1995. A method of guiding exercise intensity: the talk test. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 27, no. 5, p. S241.
6. Dehart Beverly, M., Foster, C., Porcari, J.P., Fater, D.C.W., et al., 2000. Relationship between the talk test and ventilatory threshold. Clinical Exercise Physiology, vol. 2 , pp. 34-38.
7. Dubar, C.C., Goris, C., Michielli, D.W., Kalinski, M.I., 1994. Accuracy and reproducibility of an exercise prescription based on ratings of perceived exertion for treadmill and cycle ergometer exercise. Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 1335-1344.
8. Foster, C., and J.P. Porcari., 2001. The risks of exercise training. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, vol. 21, no .6, pp. 347-352.
9. Jeans, E.A., Foster, C., Porcari, J.P., Gibson, M., et al.,2011. Translation of exercise testing to exercise prescription using the talk test. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 590-596.
10. Loose, B.D., Christiansen, A.M., Smolczyk ,J.E., Roberts, K.L., et al., 2012. Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1701–1707.
11. McArdle, W.D., Katch, F.I., Katch, V.L., 2007. Exercise physiology. (6th ed.). Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
12. Norman, J.F., Hopkins, E., Carpo, E., 2008. Validity of the counting talk test in comparison with standard methods of estimating exercise intensity in young healthy adults. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 199-202.
13. Norman, J.F., Kraci, J., Parker, D., Richter, A.A., 2002. Comparison of the counting talk test and heart rate reserve methods for estimating exercise intensity in healthy young adults. Journal of Exercise Physiology, vol. 5, no.1 , pp. 15-22.
14. Persinger, R., Foster, C., Gibson, M., Fater, D.C.W., et al., 2004. Consistency of the talk test for exercise prescription. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1632-1632.
15. Pollock, M., Pollock, M.L., Gaesser, G.A., Butcher, J.D., et al., 1998. ACSM position stand: The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness and flexibility in healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 975-991.
16. Rodriguez, M., Jose, A.V. , Gerardo, G.L., Foster, C., 2012. Relationship between the talk test and ventilatory thresholds in well trained cyclists. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 30, pp. 24-29.
17. Shafer, N.N., Foster, C., Porcari, J.P., Fater, D.C.W., 2000. Comparison of the talk test and ventilatory threshold. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 289.
18. Thompson, W.R., Gordon, N.F., Pescatello, L.S., 2010. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (8th ed.). Baltimore: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, p. 5.
19. Voelker, S.A., Foster, C., Skemp, K.M., Brice, G., et al., 2002. Relationship between the talk test and ventilatory threshold in cardiac patients. Clinical Exercise Physiology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 120-123.
20. White, J.R., 1977. EKG changes using carotid artery for heart rate monitoring. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 88-94.
)